The latest suit, dated Monday, was filed in Louisiana on behalf of 12 states and comes less than a week after another lawsuit challenging the rule . The U.S. Supreme Court January 7, 2022, held oral arguments on whether to allow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Occupational Safety and Health Administrations vaccine mandates to go into effect while appeals are heard in the courts of appeals. In a 44-page opinion, the majority of the three-judge panel criticized the Louisiana district court for issuing an almost-nationwide injunction that included Florida, explaining that it was inappropriate given the Florida district court order denying Florida an injunction and unnecessary for national uniformity. And we can expect the Texas district court to shortly enter a preliminary injunction as applied to facilities in Texas following this Fifth Circuit ruling. And the Eleventh Circuits opinion will give the federal government something to cite as it defends the CMS mandate in other courts and potentially at the U.S. Supreme Court. Legislative Package Includes Bills to Advance Biofuels Research, PTO to Begin Issuing Electronic Patent Grants, OSHA to Expand the Use of Instance-by-Instance Penalties. And because the CMS mandate is only an interim measure, the Supreme Courts action on the federal governments forthcoming application may decide, practically speaking, whether the current CMS mandate ever goes into effect before it is superseded by a final, permanent mandate. The Court will hear arguments on the two mandates separately, but, as of right now, we do not know in which order. Health care workers covered by the Biden administration's vaccine mandate will have until March 15 to be fully vaccinated in the 24 states where the requirement was reinstated by the Supreme. All affected employers should continue to monitor this quickly evolving vaccine mandate, as well as applicable state law, and be prepared to pivot, pending appeal rulings and further updates. In other words, CMS is not currently enforcing its vaccine mandate in all states, including those where the mandate is not presently judicially stayed. The federal government is asking or soon will be asking the courts of appeals to lift those stays to allow the mandate to go into effect, but that will take time to brief and decide. States brought challenges to the mandate in district courts in Florida, Missouri, Louisiana, and Texas and sought preliminary injunctions to block the mandate from going into effect. That reiteration of flexibility comes as welcome news to hospitals working to vaccinate their staffs in the face of pockets of vaccine hesitancy. . You can listen to the argument yourself on the Supreme Courts homepage: https://www.supremecourt.gov/. The U.S. Supreme Court has ordered the challengers from the Missouri and Louisiana CMS vaccine-mandate cases to respond to the federal governments application to stay those district courts preliminary injunctions by Dec. 30 at 4 p.m. He stressed that CMS always enforces its mandates flexibly and that CMS has issued guidance that hospitals who have vaccine policies and are working in good faith to get their staff vaccinated will not face enforcement, even if they dont technically meet the mandates standards. They argue that CMS did not adequately consider that the mandate might cause staffing shortages. This is the end-game that we have been waiting for. The federal government reasons that CMS has a broad mandate to protect beneficiaries health by conditioning payment to providers on providers meeting certain requirements and vaccinated staff can be one of them. It is nearly unprecedented for the Court to hear argument at the stay rather than the merits stage, as they are doing here, and typically there would have been more briefing on issues of such significance. Those states are: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. And occasionally, the Supreme Court then converts an emergency application to a full hearing on the merits. The CMS mandate was implemented through an Interim Final Rule in November. The government, as expected, moved to stay the district courts injunction pending appeal. But the Eleventh Circuit appeal is of limited practical import because the Louisiana district courts almost-nationwide injunction covers Florida. Noting that [o]ther courts are considering these same issues, the Fifth Circuit concluded that [t]he vaccine rule is an issue of great significance currently being litigated throughout the country and that [it]s ultimate resolution will benefit from airing of competing views in other courts. The court viewed the Act as limited to workplace safety standards, not broad public health measures. To the court, although COVID-19 as a risk in many workplaces, it is not an occupational hazard in most. Allowing OSHA to regulate that universal risk of COVID, the court believed, would significantly expand OSHAs regulatory authority without clear congressional authorization.. It depends on how quickly the federal government files its application at the Supreme Court and the schedule the court sets for any response. CMS website, however, states that CMS has suspended activities related to the implementation and enforcement of [the mandate] pending future developments in the litigation. AHA has confirmed with CMS that this statement applies nationwide and remains accurate even after the Fifth Circuits order staying the nationwide effect of the Louisiana district courts preliminary injunction. Unlike the Eleventh Circuits comprehensive opinion rejecting Floridas arguments challenging the mandate, the Eighth Circuits one-page order does not give its reasons for refusing to stay the Missouri district courts preliminary injunction. The, A new video from AHA and the Childrens Hospital Association is reminding the public how vaccines and boosters are safe, effective means for preventing, In a new public service announcement, leaders of the AHA, American Medical Association and American Nurses Association encourage the public to get vaccinated, When the omicron BA.4/BA.5 variants were circulating, Americans who received an updated COVID-19 vaccine were 14 times less likely to die than those who, The Food and Drug Administration last week removed the requirement for a positive COVID-19 test result to prescribe Paxlovidto certain adult and, Blog: Updates on Legal Challenges to CMS and OSHA Vaccine Mandate Rule, Advancing Health Podcast: Analysis of Supreme Court Oral Arguments on Vaccine Mandates, Updates and Resources on Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), Institute for Diversity and Health Equity, Rural Health and Critical Access Hospitals, National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC), AHA Rural Health Care Leadership Conference, Individual Membership Organization Events, The Important Role Hospitals Have in Serving Their Communities, Analysis of Supreme Court Oral Arguments on Vaccine Mandates, View the Complete CMS Case Twitter Thread, View the Complete OSHA Case Twitter Thread, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Study: COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness may wane in younger children as well, In time for Valentines Day, AHA issues supplemental toolkit on COVID-19 vaccines, Video: AHA, CHA urge vaccination to prevent COVID-19, flu and RSV infections, AHA, AMA and ANA remind Americans to get COVID-19 vaccine, updated booster, CDC: Vaccinated Americans up to 14 times less likely to die from COVID-19, FDA removes positive test requirement for two COVID-19 outpatient therapies, American Organization for Nursing Leadership. Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry is leading the charge against. But it is unlikely that the Sixth Circuit will tailor the injunction in that way; the most likely result is either upholding or vacating the Fifth Circuits stay wholesale. Expanding Regulatory Reach over Intermediaries That May Constitute How to Value Digital Assets for Donation to Charity. And as for alternatives and evidence, the court held that CMS decisions were within a zone of reasonableness and should not be second-guessed by the courts. Missouri et al. The court will soon set a deadline for the challengers to respond to the federal governments application and for the federal government to file any reply, and could rule as soon as a few days after briefing is complete. To help hospitals and health system leaders stay up-to-date on all of the legal developments related to vaccine mandates, the AHA has developed a blog authored by Sean Marotta, a partner at Hogan Lovells and outside counsel for the AHA. That decision may influence other courts considering the CMS mandate, including the U.S. Supreme Court. The courts unsigned majority opinion was joined by Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan and two of the three median justices Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh. On December 28, 2021, CMS provided answers to many of these open questions, announcing that it will begin enforcing its COVID-19 vaccine mandate as to regulated health care facilities in the District of Columbia, U.S. territories, and the 25 states where it is not currently judicially enjoined. On the CMS mandate, the federal government will likely ask the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the narrowed injunction upheld by the Fifth Circuit at the same time it asks the Supreme Court to stay the 10-state injunction upheld by the Eighth Circuit. Technically, all the court did today was decide whether the mandates will go into effect while the courts of appeals consider the challenges to them. Finally, the challengers argue that CMS did not consider various evidence or alternatives before issuing the mandate. First, the federal government, as expected, has appealed the Louisiana district courts almost-nationwide injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans. Recognizing the need for uniformity, the court imposed the injunction nationwide, despite only 14 states being a party to the lawsuit before it. I call on business leaders to immediately join those who have already stepped up including one third of Fortune 100 companies and institute vaccination requirements to protect their workers, customers, and communities. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. Nov 23, 2021, 15:45 PM. The deadline to receive one dose of the vaccine was set to begin next week. The oral arguments were an almost-four-hour marathon and predicting outcomes based on the questioned asked is always risky. Reg. BREAKING DOWN THE PRIVACY ACT REVIEW REPORT #3: Removal of The Small White House Releases National Cybersecurity Strategy, Illinois High Court Rules Per-Scan Damages Can Be Awarded Under BIPA, Grassley-Wyden Bill Aims to Fix Broken Tax Whistleblower Law, Lessons Learned From 2022s Trade Secret Verdicts, Mass. Visas for F and M Students Can Now Be Issued 365 Days Ahead of Program Start Date, Supreme Court Clarifies the Meaning Salary Basis Under Federal Overtime Law. EPA Releases Proposed Approach for Considering Cumulative Risks under Revised Colorado Privacy Act Rules Adopted for Review by Colorado AG. And following the arguments, I will have summaries here and will be doing a podcast with AHA Deputy General Counsel Chad Golder breaking down the key takeaways for hospitals. They argue that COVID has been around for two years now and that vaccines have been widely available for over six months and that there is no emergency warranting the issuance of an emergency temporary standard without public input. That mandate, too, is already subject to multiple challenges. First, the CMS mandate. Joel Zinberg. But these cases are different because they come from federal administrative agencies. Breaking the Link New Developments on U.S. A Detroit-based health system also instituted a vaccine mandate, and reported that 98 percent of the system's 33,000 workers were fully or partially vaccinated or in the process of obtaining a religious or medical exemption when the requirement went into effect, with exemptions comprising less than 1 percent of staffers. A Louisiana U.S. district judge blocked a federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers Tuesday, issuing a nationwide injunction in another setback to President Joe Biden's effort. As of this writing, just over two hours after the Sixth Circuits ruling, three groups of OSHA mandate challengers have already filed emergent applications with the Supreme Court to stay the OSHA mandate. WRKF. No matter how the court rules, expect the loser to ask the Supreme Court to step in and reverse the Sixth Circuits decision. On November 4, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a regulation mandating that all healthcare workers whose organizations receive funding from Medicare or Medicaid. "We have seen the. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. Like its Missouri counterpart, the Western District of Louisiana held that CMS lacked authority to implement the mandate. The challengers also have asked the entire 16-judge court to hear the case rather than the usual three-judge panel, a move called initial rehearing en banc. The federal government has opposed, and the motion is now before the Court for decision. And with further appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court likely, the final fate of the OSHA mandate while appeals play out may not be decided until Christmas or the end of the year. The Court has ruled that my administration cannot use the authority granted to it by Congress to require this measure, but that does not stop me from using my voice as President to advocate for employers to do the right thing to protect Americans health and economy. Traditionally, the Supreme Court acts on emergency applications such as these without oral argument. Politics and law. The Justices at oral argument are not just asking the advocates questions; they are also testing out theories of the case and signaling to their colleagues. Not only that, but CMS routinely regulates the qualifications and duties of health care professionals, justifying these regulations by its power to protect patient safety. Stephen Waguespack, president and chief executive officer of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, the state's largest and most influential business lobbyist, said mandating. v. Biden, No. The Eleventh Circuits opinion is and is intended to be a counterweight to the Louisiana and Missouri district court opinions finding the CMS mandate unlawful. CMS Vaccine Mandate Faces Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Wednesday, December 1, 2021 Highlights A federal district court in Louisiana issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against. The mandate had required all workers at facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid to get second shots by Jan. 4. The third mandate is the one at issue here: the Administration has coopted the Medicare and Medicaid system to impose a vaccine on 17 million healthcare workers. The Texas district court preliminary injunction means that the CMS vaccine mandate is paused in 25 states and in effect in another 25 states. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. But the panel held that the distinctions were not so obvious that the federal government had shown the necessary likelihood of success on appeal to stay the Louisiana district courts preliminary injunction. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit just denied a stay pending appeal of the Missouri district courts preliminary injunction enjoining the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services vaccine mandate in the 10 states that are part of that lawsuit. Records are shared through network-connected, enterprise-wide information systems or other information networks and . The majority also held that the CMS vaccine mandate was likely authorized by the Medicare and Medicaid statutes; that CMS had good cause for bypassing notice-and-comment rulemaking; and that CMS adequately considered all relevant aspects of the mandate before issuing it. As Justice Kagan put it, all [CMS] is doing here is to say the one thing you cant do is kill your patients. And Justice Kavanaugh noted that hospitals and health care facilities were not challenging the CMS mandate, suggesting they had no problem with it. The federal government on Dec. 10 filed its reply in support of its motion to lift the nationwide stay in the consolidated OSHA-mandate challenges at the Sixth Circuit. On Mon., Nov. 29, the Federal District Court in Missouri issued a preliminary injunction blocking the CMS vaccine mandate in Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, New . The court held that CMS reasonably concluded that a COVID-19 vaccine mandate was necessary to protect patient health and safety because "COVID-19 is a highly contagious, dangerous and especially for Medicare and Medicaid patients deadly disease." Court relies on major-questions doctrine to block OSHA vaccine-or-test mandate. CMS Interim Final Rule (IFR) On November 4, 2021, CMS issued its IFR (effective November 5, 2021) regarding mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations for all facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid. The federal government has until Dec. 10 to file its reply and the motion will then be ripe for decision by the Sixth Circuit. The federal governments application argues that the Missouri and Louisiana district courts misconstrued the Medicare and Medicaid statutes, that issuing the mandate without notice and comment was necessary given the ongoing pandemic, and that the agency considered all relevant information in reaching its decision. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.comare intended for general information purposes only. Three other challenges to the CMS vaccine mandate are pending in federal courts in Florida, Louisiana and Texas. GT's The Performance Review Episode 19: Is the Fight Over AB 51 5 Reasons Community Associations Need an Attorney That Specializes in New York Proposes Regulatory Review and Approval of Material Health CMS Issues Long-Awaiting Medicare Advantage RADV Final Rule, Preventing the Use of Cryptocurrencies to Evade Sanctions. Concurring, Judge Julia Gibbons concluded that [r]easonable minds may disagree on OSHAs approach to the pandemic, but we do not substitute our judgment for that of OSHA, which has been tasked by Congress with policy-making responsibilities. Judge Gibbons observed that the courts [o]nly responsibility is to determine whether OSHA has likely acted within the bounds of its statutory authority and the Constitution and concluded that OSHA had likely had done so. Part 1 training plans. Ms. Skubas defends employers against claims of discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour violations and state and federal FMLA violations. A Louisiana-based U.S. District Court judge granted a preliminary injunction Tuesday blocking the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers, just days . Court relies on congressional authority to protect patient health and safety to uphold the CMS mandate, In its opinion allowing the CMS vaccine mandate to go into effect, the court noted that CMS has broad powers to condition facilities participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs on requirements as [CMS] finds necessary in the interest of the health and safety of individuals who are furnished services in the institution. The court held that CMS reasonably concluded that a COVID-19 vaccine mandate was necessary to protect patient health and safety because COVID-19 is a highly contagious, dangerous and especially for Medicare and Medicaid patients deadly disease.. Other covered employers who were not considering a mandatory vaccine requirement may return to their policy of not requiring vaccination, subject to any applicable state law mandates. A federal court decided to halt one of those vaccine mandates. Judge Larsen also argued that the challengers had shown irreparable harm in two ways. A federal judge in Louisiana on Dec. 2 declined a case brought by 14 states challenging the Biden administration's rule that requires COVID-19 vaccination for eligible staff at healthcare. Appeals underway may result in the CMS mandate taking effect later. The federal government also contends that the OSH Acts direction that OSHA assure so far as possible every working man in the workman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions overcomes the challengers major-questions-doctrine arguments. The federal government has appealed the Missouri district courts decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and has asked the appeals court to stay the district courts preliminary injunction pending appeal. the general public of the preclusive effect on the CMS Vaccine Mandate of the Western District of Louisiana's preliminary injunction." Within hours after the Fifth Circuit decision on December 15, 2021, narrowing the Louisiana injunction only to the party states in that case, the district court on the Texas case Her practice is focused on employment litigation, preventive counseling and labor relations. Although they asked questions of both sides, the median Justices seemed generally satisfied by the answers they received from Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher defending the CMS mandate. November 27, 2022. The district court has scheduled oral argument on Texas motion for a preliminary injunction for Dec. 2 and will rule soon after. The court found that the government lacked the statutory authority to issue the rule. The Eighth Circuits denial of the federal governments motion means that the CMS vaccine mandate remains enjoined nationwide. Despite blocking President Joe Biden's vaccine mandate for private employers, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) vaccine mandate, which affects 10.4 million health care workers at 76,000 medical facilities. An update on the federal CMS vaccine mandate. Conventional wisdom says that Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch are sure votes against the mandates and that Justices Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan are sure votes in favor of the mandates. How Modern Manufacturing Plants Can Protect Against Ransomware, FTC Will Host May 23, 2023, Workshop on Recyclable Claims and the Appellate Court Affirmed An Order Denying A Beneficiarys Request For An Overview of Why Class Action Privacy Lawsuits May Have Just Gotten Gold Dome Report Legislative Day 26 (2023). The Louisiana federal court carved out of its order the 10 states that previously received a preliminary injunction from thefederal court in the Eastern District of Missouri. All rights reserved. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit split evenly, 8-8, in declining to hear the case initially en banc, meaning by the entire court as opposed to a three-judge panel. Employers Beware: Non-Disparagement and Confidentiality Covenants in Consultation Paper On Review of Corporate Governance Norms For A High Californias War On The Fast-Food Industry Continues. The arguments against the OSHA vaccine mandate are similar, but slightly different. OIRA Calls for Feedback on Recommendations to Encourage More Engagement in the Justice and Commerce Departments Announce Creation of Disruptive Technology Strike Justice Department Announces Application Form for Marijuana Pardon Certificates, Navigating the FCC's Universal Service Program: Compliance Requirements for Service Providers, Financial Services: Use of Limitation-of-Liability Clauses in Fiduciary Relationships. NIOSH Announces Publication of Article on the Results of 2019 Survey How to Donate Cryptocurrency and Other Digital Assets to Charity. July 19, 202`1. It is unclear how quickly the Sixth Circuit will rule following the completion of briefing, but the OSHA mandate will remain stayed at least through Dec. 10. Invoking the major-questions doctrine, the court stated that it expect[s] Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of vast economic and political significance. And it held that OSHAs vaccine-or-test mandate was a major question because it is a significant encroachment into the livesand the healthof a vast number of employees. The Court further emphasized that this kind of OSHA mandate was unprecedented: It is telling that OSHA, in its half century of existence, has never before adopted a broad public health regulation of this kindaddressing a threat that is untethered, in any causal sense, from the workplace. But Floridas motion for rehearing en banc will delay it seeking relief from the U.S. Supreme Court, likely putting it after applications from the federal government seeking to fully stay the Missouri and Louisiana district courts preliminary injunctions. After the Supreme Court rules, the cases will proceed on the merits in the lower courts of appeals. The courts order shows the legal and practical importance of the federal governments vaccine mandates and whether they should be stayed pending appellate review. But the Eleventh Circuit as a whole is more conservative than the three-judge panel that denied Floridas request for an injunction pending appeal, and Florida apparently hopes that the full court will overturn the three-judge panel. The latest Updates and Resources on Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). Two additional updates on the vaccine-mandate litigation following the big news out of the Fifth and Sixth Circuits. The federal government has not yet appealed the Louisiana district courts decision, but we expect it to do so soon and to ask the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to stay the preliminary injunction pending appeal. We have three small updates in the pending challenges to the CMS vaccine mandate. This post takes a look at that question. The question now is how quickly the Supreme Court will act. 4:21-cv-01329-MTS (E.D. As we also predicted from oral argument, however, the court saw the OSHA mandate as going too far. The Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccination mandate for healthcare workers has been at least temporarily halted in 10 states following an order issued by a federal judge Monday afternoon. But Judge Suttons concluding line, stating that [t]he Court should grant the petition for initial hearing en banc and leave the Fifth Circuits stay of the emergency rule in place, strongly suggests that the three-judge panel will lift the Fifth Circuit stay and allow the OSHA vaccine mandate to go into effect. On Friday, I will be live-tweeting the oral arguments at @smmarotta. End the Vaccine Mandates. The more-conservative Justices, however, argued through their questions that it is important to maintain what they saw as the appropriate balance between the executive and legislative branches, even in a pandemic. The over 40 lawsuits challenging the mandate have been consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On Friday, Jan. 7, the U.S. Supreme Court will hold oral arguments on whether to allow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Occupational Safety and Health Administrations vaccine mandates to go into effect while appeals are heard in the courts of appeals. HELENA A federal judge in Louisiana has granted a preliminary injunction against the COVID-19 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) vaccine mandate following a lawsuit filed by. CMS vaccine mandate requires all staff at health care facilities subject to the regulation, except for those with approved medical or religious exemptions, to be vaccinated. Then theres the OSHA vaccine mandate. The Eighth Circuits denial also means that the federal government can now ask the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the Missouri district courts preliminary injunction, setting up a high court showdown over whether the CMS vaccine mandate should go into effect. The federal government soon will ask the Fifth Circuit to stay the district courts preliminary injunction pending appeal, but has not done so yet. Over the weekend, and as of this writing, eight groups of challengers to the OSHA vaccine mandate filed emergency applications with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the high court to once again stay the mandate following the Sixth Circuits Dec. 17 decision to lift the Fifth Circuits previously entered stay. On Nov. 30 it entered a preliminary injunction enjoining the mandate, this time nationwide except for the states covered by the Missouri district courts injunction. The court therefore upheld the injunction only as applied to facilities in the 14 states that brought suit: Louisiana, Montana, Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, Kentucky and Ohio. We are therefore expecting a decision soon on whether the Fifth Circuit will stay the Louisiana district courts injunction, and we expect that no matter who prevails, the loser will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to step in. EXPOSED: Does a New NCLC Ex Parte Filing Expose Their True Agenda to Little Weight Given to Conclusory Expert Declaration That Repeats IPR Department of Homeland Security Provides Information Related to EB-5 PTAB: Vidal Refocuses Guidance On Fintiv Factors And Discretionary Aluminum Is Now A Hot Topic In Supply Chain And Trade. The federal governments reply also argues that the Sixth Circuit should modify any injunction so that it only removes the vaccinate portion of the vaccinate-or-test mandate or so that it allows willing employers to implement a vaccinate-or-test mandatenotwithstanding contrary state law. It is therefore almost certain that the first Dec. 6 compliance date will pass with the mandate still enjoined. So this does not end with the Sixth Circuits rulings. Noncommercial use of original content on www.aha.org is granted to AHA Institutional Members, their employees and State, Regional and Metro Hospital Associations unless otherwise indicated.